Work-related gendered violence is pervasive in the Victorian healthcare sector and harms employees’ physical and mental wellbeing, financial and work outcomes, the quality of care provided, and the healthcare sector as a whole. We are working with The Health and Community Services Union (HACSU) as research partners on their project, to understand the current state of work-related gendered violence in the sector, bring together the available evidence and offer evidence-based solutions to this systemic issue.
By: Gosia Mikołajczak, Isobel Barry, Emma Summerhayes, Michelle Ryan, Marian Baird, Natalie Barr and Becca Shepard
Posted on 1 July 2024
Key findings
Work-related gendered violence is pervasive in the Victorian healthcare sector and harms employees’ physical and mental wellbeing, financial and work outcomes, the quality of care provided, and the healthcare sector as a whole. The Victorian healthcare sector is the state’s largest workforce, employing 1 in 10 working Victorians and needs to expand to meet growing healthcare demands for mental health and disability services. High employee turnover rates present a significant challenge for meeting this projected demand. As such, addressing gendered violence in the Victorian healthcare sector is both a pressing workplace safety issue for workers who deserve to be safe and respected, and a significant economic and social concern.
We are working with The Health and Community Services Union (HACSU) as research partners on their project, ‘Breaking the Silence: Prevention of Gendered Violence in Healthcare Settings’. As part of this ongoing work, we undertook a literature review to scope the current state of work-related gendered violence in the sector, bring together the available evidence and offer evidence-based solutions to this systemic issue.
In this review we found that work-related gendered violence toward healthcare workers is often enacted by a range of perpetrators, including by patients, participants, consumers, their relatives or visitors, and disproportionately affects women and minoritised genders. The nature of direct care, often involving prioritisation of patients’, participants’, and consumers’ needs and extended contact in isolation from other staff members, puts healthcare workers at particularly high risk of gendered violence. These risks are compounded by poor working conditions, understaffing, gender stereotypes, power imbalances, and organisational and social tolerance for gendered violence against health personnel.
The current reporting systems are not well-equipped to deal with the problem and many employees do not trust them to report instances of work-related gendered violence formally. Due to these barriers and insufficient available local data, this report identifies substantial gaps in knowledge about the prevalence of gendered violence, particularly involving workers in mental health and disability industries and healthcare workers from minoritised groups.
The welcomed legislative changes affirming the positive duty of governments and employers to prevent, address and reduce the risks of harassment and violence in Australian workplaces set the ground for addressing work-related gendered violence in the Victorian healthcare sector. However, prevention and management of gendered violence requires a holistic “whole of sector” approach including:
- the creation of safe and respectful workplaces;
- changes to gendered violence policies;
- effective, transparent, and fair complaint processes for workers; ongoing training for managers and staff;
- and adequate funding from the government to ensure that these necessary measures can be introduced in all healthcare and community organisations.
Contact
Gosia Mikołajczak
Research Fellow
You may also like
12
Jul
Recognising subtle forms of workplace discrimination
Blatant acts of sexism are no longer tolerated in most workplaces, but that doesn’t mean that sexism has disappeared. Although most employees have experienced or witnessed workplace incivility, those experiences are more frequent among women and racial minorities. 'Selective incivility' (i.e., microaggressions directed toward marginalized groups) is the new, more subtle form of prejudice that is difficult to formally censor because the behavior is often ambiguous, and it is nearly impossible to prove discriminatory intent. New research with Professor Michelle Ryan and collaborators shows that our identity (who we are) shapes our reactions to these ambiguous situations in our workplace (how we see things). In fact, it even affects our perceptions of discrimination. Specifically, when we highly identify with our workplace—a sense of attachment that ordinarily offers benefits for employee motivation and engagement—it can also hinder our ability to recognize mistreatment when it occurs.
30
Jan
Why we need to stop trying to "fix" women
To address the persistence of gender inequalities, many workplace gender equality interventions have been designed and implemented by governments, gender equality practitioners, professional bodies, and organisations. In this review article we provide a critical appraisal of the literature to establish an evidence base for why "fixing" women is unlikely to be a successful approach to achieving gender equality in career trajectories.
24
Feb
Gender expectations, socioeconomic inequalities and definitions of career success
Higher Education is generally regarded as a pathway to career opportunities, and research shows that students' expectations of their career success while they are studying are an important predictor of their motivation and educational success. But, there is a lack of understanding about how students define career success, and identities and how personal characteristics, like race, gender and sexuality, intersect with these ideas of what success looks like