By Ruri Takizawa, Vincenzo Iacoviello, Michelle Ryan and Clara Kulich

In short:

Are female or male leaders are preferred during a pandemic when stereotypically feminine leadership is deemed useful?

Key findings

This research examined whether female or leaders leaders are preferred during a pandemic when stereotypically feminine leadership is deemed useful. We hypothesised that citizens prefer female (vs. male) politicians when the crisis is framed as social (rather than economic) because they believe it requires feminine (vs. masculine) leadership. 

But, although our participants believed that a social crisis required more feminine leadership than an economic one, we found that gender stereotypes didn't factor into their assessment of the political leaders. They did not deem a female leader a more suitable choice to handle this crisis or perceive the female leader as possessing more "feminine" leadership traits compared to a male one.

Contact

contact profile picture
Executive team

Michelle Ryan

Director

Intersectionality & identity, Leadership & the Glass Cliff, Relationships & the care economy, The workplace & working lives

You may also like

news thumbnail image

04
Mar

Domestic challenges and international leadership

Women in international affairs play powerful and influential roles in shaping laws and policies, negotiating on subjects of war, peace and security, and representing national interest. In Australia,…