By Sabrina Spangsdorf, Michelle Ryan and Teri Kirby

In Short:

This study investigates how context might influence adolescent boys’ and girls’ ambition and the impact of gender role conformity and social status

Key findings

 

Adolescent participants reported their ambition in one of three experimentally manipulated contexts: future education, future work, or a control. Boys experienced a significant negative drop in ambition in a future education context versus control. There was no difference for girls. Gender role conformity moderated the effects for boys such that the more conform, the less ambitious in an educational context. There was no moderating effect for girls. Social status had no moderating effect. Explanations are discussed, including how negative academic gender role stereotypes may affect boys’ ambition and the importance of addressing boys’ cultures at school.

Contact

contact profile picture
Executive team

Michelle Ryan

Director

Intersectionality & identity, Leadership & the Glass Cliff, Relationships & the care economy, The workplace & working lives

You may also like

news thumbnail image

27
May

Sex wars and TERF wars

An increasing number of people identify as feminists, but there is disagreement about whom and what feminism should be fighting for.

news thumbnail image

24
Feb

Gender expectations, socioeconomic inequalities and definitions of career success

Higher Education is generally regarded as a pathway to career opportunities, and research shows that students' expectations of their career success while they are studying are an important…

news thumbnail image

23
Mar

"Fitting in whilst standing out"

Professional British women of African, Asian, and Caribbean ethnicities contend with unique challenges and experiences in the workplace. These challenges are often due to experiences that occur at…