In this Landmark article, Professor Michelle Ryan outlines four common missteps that are made when designing and implementing workplace gender equality initiatives
By: Michelle Ryan
Posted on 6 January 2023
Overview
Despite much progress in the past 50 years, workplace gender inequality remains a persistent problem.Worldwide, women only occupy about 37 per cent of leadership roles, the pay gap sits at approximately 20 per cent, and women remain concentrated in low-status, low-paid jobs.
There are countless initiatives designed to address workplace gender equality – those that try to attract women to certain professions and roles where they are under-represented, those that try to support women's career trajectories, and those that try to retain women in the workforce. While the impetus behind these initiatives is generally positive, many of these interventions are not based on evidence, in terms of their design, their implementation or in the evaluation of their efficacy.
In this Landmark article, Professor Michelle Ryan outlines four common missteps that are made when designing and implementing workplace gender equality initiatives:
- When we do not go beyond describing the numbers
- When we try to ‘fix’ women rather than fix systems
- When we are overly optimistic about the progresswe have made; and
- When we fail to recognise the intersectionality of the experiences that women face.
The article considers each of these missteps in term, presenting research that suggests alternative ways of approaching gender equality initiatives.
Contact
You may also like
Addressing work-related gendered violence against Victorian healthcare workers
Work-related gendered violence is pervasive in the Victorian healthcare sector and harms employees’ physical and mental wellbeing, financial and work outcomes, the quality of care provided, and the healthcare sector as a whole. We are working with The Health and Community Services Union (HACSU) as research partners on their project, to understand the current state of work-related gendered violence in the sector, bring together the available evidence and offer evidence-based solutions to this systemic issue.
Recognising subtle forms of workplace discrimination
Blatant acts of sexism are no longer tolerated in most workplaces, but that doesn’t mean that sexism has disappeared. Although most employees have experienced or witnessed workplace incivility, those experiences are more frequent among women and racial minorities. 'Selective incivility' (i.e., microaggressions directed toward marginalized groups) is the new, more subtle form of prejudice that is difficult to formally censor because the behavior is often ambiguous, and it is nearly impossible to prove discriminatory intent. New research with Professor Michelle Ryan and collaborators shows that our identity (who we are) shapes our reactions to these ambiguous situations in our workplace (how we see things). In fact, it even affects our perceptions of discrimination. Specifically, when we highly identify with our workplace—a sense of attachment that ordinarily offers benefits for employee motivation and engagement—it can also hinder our ability to recognize mistreatment when it occurs.
Why we need to stop trying to "fix" women
To address the persistence of gender inequalities, many workplace gender equality interventions have been designed and implemented by governments, gender equality practitioners, professional bodies, and organisations. In this review article we provide a critical appraisal of the literature to establish an evidence base for why "fixing" women is unlikely to be a successful approach to achieving gender equality in career trajectories.