Diversity, equity, and inclusion aren't just ideals—they're key drivers of innovation and meaningful research.
Posted on
About the project
We are proud to be partnering with the Wiyi Yani U Thangani Institute for First Nations Gender Justice and CSIRO’s ON Innovation Program to explore how we can create a more inclusive, equitable, and impactful innovation ecosystem in Australia.
This research project recognises that diversity, equity and inclusion are not just aspirational values – they are essential to driving meaningful innovation. We’re working to better understand how programs like CSIRO’s ON Innovation Program can support researchers and innovators from all backgrounds through safe, supportive, and accessible systems.
We’re seeking input from people of all genders (including non-binary folks), aged 18 and over, who work in government, academia, or the innovation sector. You don’t need to have been involved in the CSIRO ON Program to take part — your insights are valuable, regardless of your experience.
By sharing your perspective, you’ll be contributing to a research project focused on creating lasting change in the innovation sector — one shaped by lived experience, cultural safety, and belonging.
Contact
You may also like
Addressing work-related gendered violence against Victorian healthcare workers
Work-related gendered violence is pervasive in the Victorian healthcare sector and harms employees’ physical and mental wellbeing, financial and work outcomes, the quality of care provided, and the healthcare sector as a whole. We are working with The Health and Community Services Union (HACSU) as research partners on their project, to understand the current state of work-related gendered violence in the sector, bring together the available evidence and offer evidence-based solutions to this systemic issue.
Recognising subtle forms of workplace discrimination
Blatant acts of sexism are no longer tolerated in most workplaces, but that doesn’t mean that sexism has disappeared. Although most employees have experienced or witnessed workplace incivility, those experiences are more frequent among women and racial minorities. 'Selective incivility' (i.e., microaggressions directed toward marginalized groups) is the new, more subtle form of prejudice that is difficult to formally censor because the behavior is often ambiguous, and it is nearly impossible to prove discriminatory intent. New research with Professor Michelle Ryan and collaborators shows that our identity (who we are) shapes our reactions to these ambiguous situations in our workplace (how we see things). In fact, it even affects our perceptions of discrimination. Specifically, when we highly identify with our workplace—a sense of attachment that ordinarily offers benefits for employee motivation and engagement—it can also hinder our ability to recognize mistreatment when it occurs.
Why we need to stop trying to "fix" women
To address the persistence of gender inequalities, many workplace gender equality interventions have been designed and implemented by governments, gender equality practitioners, professional bodies, and organisations. In this review article we provide a critical appraisal of the literature to establish an evidence base for why "fixing" women is unlikely to be a successful approach to achieving gender equality in career trajectories.