We wanted to understand how perceptions of a candidate's attractiveness influences perceptions their leadership suitability in the hiring process

By: Sara Pireddu, Renata Bongiorno, Michelle Ryan, Monica Rubini and Michela Menegatti

Posted on 13 August 2021

Key findings

 

In three studies in the United Kingdom, using student and working samples and two managerial descriptions, we found an unexpected pattern of results, supported by an internal meta-analysis: attractiveness and competence were the most important predictors of hire-ability for all candidates. 

For women, dominance was the next most important predictor; for men, morality and sociability were more important than dominance. Moreover, morality and sociability were more important in evaluating men than women, while dominance was more important in evaluating women than men. 

Findings are discussed in terms of a ‘deficit bias’, whereby the qualities women and men are considered to lack – dominance for women, morality, and sociability for men – may be given more weight when evaluating their leadership suitability.

Contact

You may also like

news thumbnail image

30
Jan

Why we need to stop trying to "fix" women

To address the persistence of gender inequalities, many workplace gender equality interventions have been designed and implemented by governments, gender equality practitioners, professional bodies, and organisations. In this review article we provide a critical appraisal of the literature to establish an evidence base for why "fixing" women is unlikely to be a successful approach to achieving gender equality in career trajectories.

news thumbnail image

01
Jul

Glass cliff candidates in the 2022 election

Our analysis of the women candidates running in unwinnable seats in the 2022 federal election

news thumbnail image

27
Jul

The diplomatic Glass Cliff

For the first time in history, women in Australian diplomacy have equal or near-equal representation in leadership whilst the institution they represent is shrinking — in funding, footprint and status. Even if simply a natural shift in policy priorities, this diplomatic ‘glass cliff’ has specifically gendered effects.